|
|
|
|
|
|
by 001sky
5028 days ago
|
|
|
This is an interesting thesis, but not self evidently true. This is your logic: A is independent of B. B could be anything. A is independent of B. _______ But... B could be a Set such that A is a subset of B. A and B could also be terms in a Set Z, which includes A & B |
|
|