[001sky]

they also note that this is outside the scope of evolution

--What's rare, is that he is not making this point.

[CamperBob2]

And chemists rarely go out of their way to explain that their papers are outside the scope of biology. So?

[001sky]

Nonsensical formulation. Tell me again how chemistry and biology are non-intersecting? DNA? Wait, what? You need to drop [bracket] sub-segments of science, they are boring and arbitrarty. Just use [science]. You'd tell the interviewee he not a [scientist]? Are you arguing he needs to go outside of scinence to answer his question? That would be a pretty anti-science perspective.

[CamperBob2]

You sound like one of those fellows who exhibits a lot of healthy skepticism 6 days a week, while leaving it at home on the 7th. Why don't you drop the facade and argue your actual point?

[001sky]

001Sky is a Riddle, shrouded in mystery, wrapped inside an Enigma. Thank you very much.

That is a lovely compliment. Trying to understand the rest of what you've written though? Is nearly impossible.

It's like you've run out of logic (fail). Now you're only left with Ad hominem in-articulare?

The actual point was made in the original post.