|
|
|
|
|
by josephfung
5028 days ago
|
|
Like the title, but was disappointed. Coming up with a spec format that clients will like has always been a fairly easy problem to solve - as well the spec is usually worked on once the project has been awarded, so isn't even part of the sales process. As well it's hard to improve the writing + sharing experience of Word + Email or Google Docs + Sharing. The attention to estimating is nice, and will save freelancers or less experienced teams time, but is only really useful to teams that do contract and custom work. I was hoping for more of a focus on the collaborative work that comes out of writing specs: more around the commenting/editing/workflow. When working on a spec (either internal or external) change requests or modifications are important, as are interdependencies and change tracking. Your product title made me think "GitHub for Specs" and it doesn't seam you're going that way. Shame. |
|
We intend on reading every single feedback left on our form and here and discuss how we can better serve our potential users.
By the way - I loved the "github for specs" :)