[markatlarge]

Because in research circles, it is a good idea — or at least standard practice. Academic Torrents is a public data-sharing platform run for researchers, and the dataset is cited in peer-reviewed AI papers and used in university projects.

I wasn’t browsing porn — I was benchmarking an on-device NSFW detection model. I never reviewed every file; my workflow was automated preprocessing. The only “mistake” was unzipping it in Google Drive, not realizing Google scans those files automatically and can flag them without context.

If Google truly cares about stopping harmful content, why not give researchers the exact file names so they can verify and have dataset maintainers remove it? That’s how you improve the data and prevent future issues — assuming it was a violation at all and not a false positive.

The real issue is that whether it’s for research, unintentional, or a false positive, there’s no fair process outside of Google to resolve it. Instead of an immediate, irreversible account ban, they could quarantine the suspected files while preserving access to the rest of the account. That would protect both children and innocent users.