[copularent]

As shown by the GPT-5 reaction, a majority of people just have nothing better to ask the models than how many times does the letter "s" appear in "stupid".

[jandrese]

I think this is a completely valid thing to do when you have Sam Altman going on the daily shows and describing it as a genius in your pocket and how it's smarter than any human alive. Deflating hype bubbles is an important service.

[Terr_]

Yeah: Like with self-driving vehicles, the characteristics of when and how something breaks are important, not just some average error-rate.

If users cannot anticipate what does or doesn't constitute risky usage or potential damages, things go Extra Wrong.

[saati]

But the point is, why would you trust it for anything at all, when it can't do an incredibly simple thing reliably at all? (Yes, I understand the tokenizer makes this hard, but still, it's a quick demonstration that it's just bad technology.)

[Towaway69]

2 time(s)