[eru]

You are suggesting a decent way to work around the limitations of the current iteration of this technology.

The grand-parent comment was pointing out that this limitation exists; not that it can't be worked around.

[diggan]

> The grand-parent comment was pointing out that this limitation exists

Sure, I agree with that, but I was replying to the comment my reply was made as a reply to, which seems to not use this workflow yet, which is why they're seeing "a loop that hallucinates over and over".