|
|
|
|
|
by throwanem
317 days ago
|
|
> I don't know man, if you think it's fine for parents to abort downs babies, I think that means you're the utilitarian. > You can try deny it, but in your heart of hearts you think it's fine to value avoiding the inconvenience of a downs baby higher than the value of a fetus's life. > That's pretty damn utilitarian. Thank you for conceding that utilitarianism trivially entails arrogating unto oneself the right to decide universally who lives and who dies, in quite literally every imaginable case - this being obviously true to so reflexive and unreflected-upon an extent that you can only conceive of even an overtly hostile and disdainful interlocutor arguing he should instead be given that power, rather than that no one should. Is there anything you'd care to add to that, or are you content with having revealed your vicious ideology in all its bare-fanged, blood-soaked glory? |
|
So you believe that red states which disallow aborting downs babies are more moral than blue states that allow aborting downs babies?
Since the red states are the only ones that try to ensure that "no one has that power" (to abort downs babies)