|
|
|
|
|
by andix
322 days ago
|
|
It's a bit of an edge case. It makes a good point and it uses text from a credible source. AFAIK everything NASA publishes is royalty free and can just be copied. One additional sentence between the image and the content like this and it would probably be fine: "The explanation from OpenAI has some major flaws, here is how this NASA source explains it:" |
|