|
|
|
|
|
by caminante
320 days ago
|
|
Either you're acting in bad faith or have a language issue. For the latter, isn't it odd how you cherrypick and dismiss? 1. Spuriously apply national averages (including a UK forum!!! LOL) to a way above average zip code 2. And conveniently dismiss another HNer's conclusion because they...didn't provide a fact needed for an argument that YOU are trying to make and could research yourself? This is unreal. >"Yeah, even though I didn't ask, the defendent didn't tell me they were innocent or not, so I will dismiss further review and assume they're guilty." |
|
You said "what most would consider to be a source of ridicule (4BR SFH in 2k sqft)". You didn't say that it would only be a source of ridicule in certain zip codes.
Whose conclusion am I dismissing? chasebank's? I think chasebank's conclusion is that housing is too expensive. I agree with chasebank there. I'm not dismissing that.