|
|
|
|
|
by dspillett
321 days ago
|
|
Picking 300MB as a ridiculous amount of data to download dates that nicely without needing to look at the article header. Though using the codecs and hardware of that time I doubt the quality at even that size would be great. Compare an old 349MB (sized to fit two on a CD-R/-RW, likely 480p though smaller wasn't uncommon) cap of a Stargate episode picked up in the early/mid 20XXs to a similarly sized file compressed using h265 or even h264 on modern hardware. |
|
H.265 or H.264 would absolutely crush Xvid for compressing HD content, both in size and quality.