Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by unnah 310 days ago
Did you ever try doing your programming exercises in AmigaBASIC instead? It was also made by Microsoft, so it should have been quite compatible with GW-BASIC.
2 comments

AmigaBASIC was both great and awful at the same time. On one hand it integrated quite well - you could write an interface definition that'd let it call system libraries relatively easily, and so could do a lot with it - but it was also buggy, and fell by the wayside pretty quickly on the Amiga in favour of AREXX (which was awful as a language, but the ability to script all your applications was fantastic)
Buggy? Aside from the abuse of the upper 8 bits of 32 bit pointers that prevented its use on newer CPUs, I don't recall hitting a lot of bugs in AmigaBASIC. Perhaps my memory is just old and faded.
That was the main/biggest one. I don't recall specifics on anything else - it wasn't much worse than most other software of the era.
Amiga BASIC was Microsoft's first BASIC with a GUI and first BASIC without line numbers. It's not very good.