|
|
|
|
|
by MisterMower
318 days ago
|
|
The fact that it cost hundreds of millions to put these satellites into orbit is irrelevant. That’s sunk cost. The only relevant question is whether the data collected from them is worth $15M a year. I don’t think it is. Think about all the carbon you could sequester with $15M a year. You could lease thousands of acres of farmland in the Midwest, plant trees, and sequester thousands of tons of carbon for that amount of money. But no, we must keep spending money on projects like this to keep the climate hysteria at a maximum. It’s hard to produce headlines like “Atmospheric Carbon Rises to a New High Under Trump administration” without this satellite, you know. Remind me, who has ulterior motives or terrible judgement? |
|