|
|
|
|
|
|
by taeric
312 days ago
|
|
|
Hmm... I thought I just took the basic google, but that seems to give a different result now. Maybe I just fat fingered copying into here, not sure. I know that my main assertion there was it was a relatively lower number. Adding it to the 19 of this story would still leave owner occupied higher than 50ish. Such that I clearly need help to put a lot of this together. |
|
|