[shkkmo]

> I think your concerns are legit, but it's not necessarily the reviewer's fault that they're on three deadlines and don't have the time to give your product the care and concern it deserves. It's probably the editor's or the publisher's.

You wrote it, you don't get to dodge the responsibility like that. Professional integrity still matters.

> It's like when I was reviewing albums for $50 a pop: I'd get a stack of them to review and cue up track one and if I didn't get hooked pretty quick, I'd just pop in the next one.

That seems unethical.

> There's a reason I'd rather make a living as a mediocre coder than a very good writer these days

As coders, we also have an ethical responsibility to pushback against code that will harm people.

We need more writers to say no to writing stories with insufficient time/resources to do it ethically same as we need more developers who push back against building unethical products.