|
|
|
|
|
|
by BizarroLand
325 days ago
|
|
|
Every time something comes along like this there's a revolt. Photoshop. First Analog synthesizers and then digital synthesizers. Multitrack audio recording. Digital Recording. Autotune. Vocaloids. These things change the nature of the game and invalidate the labor of the people who used to be winners, and I get it. If you take the money and the fame out of the equation, though, the point of art is not to become rich and famous, it's to communicate. Eventually, we will find artists who are finally able to send in a way that others want to receive thanks to AI. And there will be people like me and probably you that prefer to only hear what a human had to say straight from their own mouths. And that's fine. There are no walls. |
|
|
"“There is a lot of controversy about KISS’ ‘Alive!’ Did they play their own record or did they overdub? News Flash! You’re allowed to overdub! You’re allowed to do that. It’s not a crime. If you’re making an album and you want to overdub one part, that’s completely allowed, and everybody does it. "
https://rockcelebrities.net/sebastian-bach-addresses-the-ove...
Even modern musicians call studio composing "cheating"
"In a way it's kind of like cheating cause you can play stuff over and over again, and be like, no, that's bad, cut this, move it over, and then kind of fit the lyrics to it."
https://pitchfork.com/features/interview/6759-yeasayer/
Even Analog vs Digital records:
"Neil Young, who has been very expressive about analog vs digital and which digital medium he prefers. This undated quote is about cds:
“The mind has been tricked, but the heart is sad.”"
https://forums.stevehoffman.tv/threads/quotes-from-musicians...
Like, you don't have to like it. That's fine.
But if there is art there, you should not dismiss it because of the tools used to make it.
Right now I imagine there is so close to no art from AI that it can be said that there is none at all.
I also imagine that will change in the next 20 years.