Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by seanmcdirmid 320 days ago
They want to ensure that TSMC doesn't have a controlling stake.
1 comments
sct202 320 days ago
The remaining 51% would be highly fractured unless it was like the US government on the otherside. One of the publicly traded companies I worked at effectively got taken over with <20% of regular shares by an activist billionaire.
link
rvba 319 days ago
The 51% would be controlled by the few people from funds, who live in USA - and who are easy to "influence"
link
seanmcdirmid 320 days ago
Ya, they would have to make their stake non-voting regardless, then what would be the point? I don't think Trump thought this through.
link