[podgietaru]

I like living in a world where I know that people who have spent actually time on nurturing a talent get rewarded for doing so, even if that talent is not something I will ever be good at.

I don't want to live in a world where these things are generated cheaply and easily for the profit of a very select few group of people.

I know the world doesn't work like I described in the top paragraph. But it's a lot closer to it than the bottom.

[wolttam]

It's hard to see how there will be room for profit as this all advances

There will be two classes of media:

- Generated, consumed en-masse by uncreative, uninspired individuals looking for cheap thrill

- Human created, consumed by discerning individuals seeking out real human talent and expression. Valuing it based merely on the knowledge that a biological brain produced (or helped produce) it.

I tend to suspect that the latter will grow in value, not diminish, as time progresses

[skeezyboy]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pause_Giant_AI_Experiments:_An...

people said the world could literally end if we train anything bigger than chatgpt4... I would take these projections with a handful of salt

[pizzathyme]

This is an incredible artifact.

[amarcheschi]

At this point we should have been dead for God knows how many times (I'm not going to check yud's Twitter for his actual predictions)

[skybrian]

It seems to me that you’re describing Hollywood? Admittedly, there are big budget productions, but Hollywood is all about fakery, it’s cheap for the consumer, and there’s a lot of audience-pleasing dreck.

There’s no bright line between computer and human-created video - computer tools are used everywhere.

[bko]

> I like living in a world where I know that people who have spent actually time on nurturing a talent get rewarded for doing so, even if that talent is not something I will ever be good at.

Rewarded how? 99.99% of people who do things like sports or artistic like writing never get "rewarded for doing so", at least in the way I imagine you mean the phrase. The reward is usually the experience itself. When someone picks up a ball or an instrument, they don't do so for some material reward.

Why should anyone be rewarded materially for something like this? Why are you so hung up on the <0.001% that can actually make some money now having to enjoy the activity more as a hobby than a profession.

[podgietaru]

99.99% of people, really? You think there isn't a huge swath of the economy that are made up of professional writers, artists, musicians, graphic designers, and all the other creative professionals that the producers of these models aim to replicate the skills of?

Why am I so "hung up" on the livelihood of these people?

Doing art is a Hobby is a good in and of itself. I did not say otherwise. But when I see a movie, when I listen to a song, I want to appreciate the integrity and talent of the people that wrote them. I want them to get paid for that enjoyment. I don't think that's bizarre.

[holoduke]

You can still makes movies , music etc. But now with better tools. Just accept the new reality and try to play this new level. The old won't come back. Its a waste of time to complain and feel frustrated. There are plenty of opportunities to express your creativity.

[fantasizr]

I could see that theater and live music (especially performed on acoustic instruments) become hyper popular because it'll be the only talent worth paying to see when everything else is 'cheaply' made.

[pessimizer]

> I like living in a world where I know that people who have spent actually time on nurturing a talent get rewarded for doing so, even if that talent is not something I will ever be good at.

That world has only existed for the last hundred or so years, and the talent is usually brutally exploited by people whose main talent is parasitism. Only a tiny percentage of people who sell creative works can make a living out of it; the living to be made is in buying their works at a premium, bundling them, and reselling them, while offloading almost all of the risk to the creative as an "advance."

Then you're left in a situation where both the buyer of art and the creator of art are desperate to pander to the largest audience possible because everybody is leveraged. It's a dogshit world that creates dogshit art.