|
|
|
|
|
by ApeWithCompiler
314 days ago
|
|
In my opinion the comparison to calculators is flawed. At least for simpler calculators as someone might imagine. In its application that would mean for a LLM you define a sentence with one blank, restructure the sentence so the blank gets extracted and then enter it into the LLM to get exactly one word for your blank.
On the oppoisite you wouldn't use the calculator for solving equations, but to also formulate them based on a abstract definition. Furthermore "math" and "text" are two fundamentaly distinct categories. In math we express mathematical observations/context, which can be proven in its correctnes. We can conclude that 1 Apple + 2 Apples won't result in 5 Apples, but 3.
Text may express emotions, toughts, directives, information or observations in context of its author. Not in every case it may be proven as math and we may attribute other values to it. Like honesty, authenticity, information and effort.
If it was only for the information, you could filter out hallucinations and call it a day. But for other values you literally can not outsource the work to a tool. Except you live in a South Park episode. |
|