|
|
|
|
|
by nextos
311 days ago
|
|
Can you elaborate on what were the friction points? I migrated from Arch to Nix several years back because I found maintenance to be incredibly easy and it also allows me to test things without fear. Arch and other imperative distros are still superior for some workflows, but you can always run something imperative inside Nix like FHSEnv or DistroBox. Nix is also available in Arch extra, so it's also possible to do this the other way round, with Arch as a host. |
|
- for every configuration item in the software I use, I basically need to learn the way to NixOS-configure it (assuming I don't want to raw-configure everything)
- experimentation is onerous (unless there are workflows I don't know), for example: messing with my sway config requires rebuild switches
I'm not bailing (yet?) but the "ergonomics", well, don't feel ergonomic.