|
|
|
|
|
by sarchertech
312 days ago
|
|
I get that there are tradeoffs and that logographic languages have advantages and disadvantages. In this case specifically though there seems to be a pretty strong consensus that one of the advantages of a phonetic alphabet is ease and time to learn. In a completely phonetic language (which English is obviously not) once a kid learns the alphabet and around 50 phonemes you can represent with it, their auditory and reading vocabulary is roughly the same. So you can have 6 year olds with a reading vocabulary of 20k words. It’s not that simple, but clearly the more phonetic a language is the easier it is to learn for someone who can already understand the spoken words. |
|