[cantor_S_drug]

Please ignore if my statements are ignorant.

I always wondered that whenever such reports or surveys come out why don't these organisations make the whole data and methodology public? Are they afraid that if they made it public, people will know how muddy these waters are?

[OtherShrezzing]

If you’re collecting data on human rights abuses, you get more high quality first hand reports if you protect your sources.

[caseysoftware]

When they don't release the data and/or methodolgy, you have to treat the result the same: garbage.

They could be completely making up data or demonstrating the gold standard example of pristine data collection and brilliant analysis but we'd never know.. and for some reason, they don't want to tell us.

[FirmwareBurner]

> for some reason, they don't want to tell us

It should be pretty clear why they don't want to show and tell.

[caseysoftware]

I'm quite confident on why they don't want to share their data and/or methodology but there could be legitimate reasons and I want to be open to those.

Regardless, without that information, we can only evaluate them based on how rigorus they've been in the past:

Are the researchers and organizations involved known for effective data collection and solid analysis?

[FirmwareBurner]

>but there could be legitimate reasons and I want to be open to those

Then they the should just say what those reasons are. What's there to hide?

You can't expect to be opaque and then the public to blindly trust you simply on the basis that you call yourself experts.

[vr46]

Some of it is legitimately journalistic and protecting sources.