|
|
|
|
|
by dastbe
321 days ago
|
|
we’re talking about wiping out most of the stored wealth of roughly a quarter of all homeowners here. and they cannot take that home with them when a new job opportunity comes up or worse get fired/sick. this sounds more like a suicide pact than a plan. |
|
But there's two things here:
1. allowing people freedom to make their own choices.
2. the dangers of borrowing large sums of money
Adding those two together in a free(for some notion of free) market means there will be losers. In this case, the outcome sucks but it isn't like they lost their life in a car crash.
If you start guaranteeing outcomes... that way madness lies.