[CyberDildonics]

> they produce output that looks like the result of those things

Is a cardboard cutout human to some degree? Is a recording a voice? What about a voice recording in a phone menu?

> LLMs have greater memory than humans,

So does a bank of hard drives by that metric.

[quesera]

(Memory Access + Correlation Skills) is a decent proxy for several of the many kinds of human intelligence.

HDDs don't have correlation skills, but LLMs do. They're just not smart-human-level "good", yet.

I am not sure whether I believe AGI will happen. To be meaningful, it would have to be above the level of a smart human.

Building an army of disincorporated average-human-intelligence actors would be economically "productive" though. This is the future I see us trending toward today.

Most humans are not special. This is dystopian, of course. Not in the "machines raise humans for energy" sort of way, but probably no less socially destructive.

[CyberDildonics]

HDDs don't have correlation skills, but LLMs do

So which is it, the memory or the correlation? I'll give you a hint, this is a trick question.

[quesera]

I never suggested that it was one or the other.

I think it's very obviously both.

(and these two qualities are likely necessary, but not sufficient)

[CyberDildonics]

So according to you there is a threshold where someone who can't remember enough or correlate things stops being human?

[quesera]

Stops exhibiting human intelligence, on at least some of the many axes thereof, yes definitely.

I feel like you're trying to gotcha me into some corner, but I'm not sure you're reading my comments fully. Or perhaps I'm being less clear than I think.

I don't mean to be ungracious, but am I missing something here?

[CyberDildonics]

It's not a gotcha, I just don't think you're thinking through the implications of what you're saying when you think only in terms of being able to fake thought with statistics.