[relaxing]

The reasons why it is beneficial are well known. It’s bizarre you failed to pick up that knowledge in high school civics class.

And the downsides to federal departments staffed by political hacks and flunkies are playing out in front of us.

[jpadkins]

federal departments have always been staffed by political hacks and flunkies. This is not a new phenomenon. But no one has articulated a better way that is also responsive to the electorate.

Monarchy would probably result in a much more efficient gov, with competent staffed departments. But it's not ruled by the people. I still don't see any good arguments on why un-elected bureaucracies is better than status quo.

[aredox]

>Monarchy would probably result in a much more efficient gov, with competent staffed departments.

... Thank you for this joke, Curtis Yarvin. Now get off.