| > What, the cloud scanning of user photos was a good idea for you? That is what is happening before Apples suggestion and is still happening. > The automated surveillance that could lead to people wrongfully accused idea? A hash scan is perfectly fine. It can tell you nothing about what is in your file except that if it matches another file that they know is CP. Even then a flagged item has to be reviewed by law enforcement in case of a mistake and a single file is normally not enough to convict. The chance is very slim of a mismatch. Facebook for example report a 1 in 50 billion chance of a mismatch. To put that in context. The chance of a miss is 1 photo every 10 years across all users of facebook (approx 3 billion active users). > If Apple can decrypt your data when they find a match, they can decrypt ALL your data. Again. This is what is happening now for ALL service providers. Apples suggestion was that if a file wasn't flagged it could only be decrypted by the owners device and nothing else. Not even Apple. |