[ffjffsfr]

> gatekeeping and censorship

that's a weird thing to say about simply banning payments to people who profit from rape and incest content.

> AREN'T EVEN TOLD what is going on

it is very clear what is going on, they are making content profiting from rape and incest and they are getting punished for it.

[duxup]

I don't think you read my post entirely / clearly.

[ffjffsfr]

I don't think you read the post you are commenting about. Article says explicitly what is the problem with problematic content. It explicitly mentions rape and incest content.

[duxup]

You quoted my words, if you aren’t interested what I was saying/ my example … don’t reply to me or quote me then?

[const_cast]

Is this content legal, or do you just personally find it objectionable?

Because, no offense, nobody cares what you find objectionable. You could've replaced "rape and incest content" in your comment with "silly content" and it would've had the same impact.

Not that I don't think rape or incest are objectionable, of course I do. I just don't think I or you get to make that determination. I'm self-absorbed, but not that self-absorbed. That's a collective decision that should be made.