[holsta]

> Both extremes want the same thing.

Citation needed. The 'extreme' feminism & LGBT tends to revolve around identical pay, being able to walk down the street without getting assaulted or being able to work without being harassed or discriminated against.

[pseudo0]

Feminist groups also regularly try to get games banned from Steam, typically for sexism or violence against women. Eg.

> Women in Games CEO Dr Marie-Claire Isaaman has called on Valve to “act urgently” and remove the game from Steam, saying the game’s content “is not only vile and dangerous, but also actively promotes the dehumanisation of women and girls.”

https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/women-in-games-call...

[AlexandrB]

They also try to ban books that disagree with their beliefs: https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/amazon-will-not-remo...

[holsta]

> In “Irreversible Damage,” Abigail Shrier argues youth are being “fast-tracked” into medical transition — a claim experts say isn’t true and harms trans youth.

Anti-trans activities is the fascist agenda. Fascism should always be stopped. Saving democracy and lives of transpeople by stopping fascists is not controversial in any way.

[holsta]

When you start digging past their marketing material, you quickly discover that these organisations are just right-wing fronts, against trans-people, against abortion.

Here's a 38 minute video that walks through some of the recent major incidents.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmHHnPLllUk

Feminists would not campaign to take down games (with zero sexual content) about queer lives made by queer people.

[zahlman]

Who gets to decide who is or isn't a "feminist"?

Why should feminism be incompatible with right-wing politics?

How do I know what is or isn't a legitimate feminist position, given that the list apparently constantly changes over time?

I am constantly told that there are many different kinds of feminism and that my various complaints about feminism — based on actual interactions I've personally had with feminists — are not valid because they don't generalize across the whole thing (even if I point at well-known, established feminist literature and critiques thereof). Yet I also constantly see groups of self-identified feminists point at each other and try to claim that the others don't actually count as feminists because they disagree about some other issue.

I assume you accept the validity of more than two genders. Will you accept the validity of more than two kinds of political position?

[zahlman]

>The 'extreme' feminism & LGBT tends to revolve around

There are countless statements from feminist authority figures that are impossible to reconcile with this claim. But HN is not the place to have this argument, or even to attempt to turn it into a discussion; and elsewhere on the Internet, I have repeatedly seen people persecuted as misogynists simply for collating such evidence.

[Forgeties79]

It’s very easy to make everyone you agree with sound incredibly reasonable when you don’t have to give any examples of when they showed their true colors.

[zahlman]

If this wasn't your point, perhaps you should consider how this applies to holsta's comment.