|
|
|
|
|
by flumpcakes
327 days ago
|
|
The UK law was designed to be all encompassing. Why block just the 'porn sites' when you can see porn on forums? The UK law is actually a good implementation if you put child 'safety' as your number one priority, with any other considerations as, in practise, moot. Unfortunately I think free civil discourse between adults, privacy, etc. are just as important as child safety which makes the current law a bit crap. This is similar to the video game and MasterCard/VISA issue - you can buy games that promote sexual violence and incest. Nothing stops children downloading them for free, or using their under-18s debit card from purchasing the non-free versions. In this instance it was private companies leveraging their freedom of association rather than an all encompassing law from a sovereign state, but the intent is the same. As a collective society we do really need to come to grips with what it is that we want. Allowing kids to freely access gang torture/execution videos and playing pro-rape entertainment should probably be tackled. I'm not sure I agree with the implementations though. |
|