Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by NKosmatos 321 days ago
And like most things nowadays, it would get filled with highly illegal content within hours of you putting it there. The good old (innocent) days are gone and the society we’re living is not mature/educated enough for such ideas.
2 comments
pkulak 321 days ago
I don't think the idea is to put it on the global internet; just make it broadcast a wifi SSID.
link
jjkaczor 321 days ago
As others have said - it would be standalone, not connected to the internet.

Have debated making it "read-only", but then I would be culpable for the curation of content...

That and perhaps I just don't want to encourage people loitering around in front of my house for long-transfers...

OTOH - this could be useful for essentially a "dead-drop" independent standalone box for, uh... "civil disobedience" reasons... (or a free alternative to those "prepper-internet-in-a-box" devices they are currently selling...)

link
aspenmayer 321 days ago
Check this out. This was at one point one of the cheapest and smallest Linux computers around. It’s USB powered and this project turns a WiFi device designed to share photos from an SD card over a standalone SSID into a male USB A powered miniature SBC. (Edit: okay it’s two PCBs technically)

https://github.com/Emeryth/openwrt-zsun

https://wiki.hackerspace.pl/projects:zsun-wifi-card-reader

I got them in bulk from China for ~$6 each.

link
echelon_musk 321 days ago
It would still be physically located on your property with potentially illegal content on it. Sounds like a nightmare.
link
jjkaczor 321 days ago
... well, I live in Canada - my understanding is that the maximum lifetime fine for copyright infringement is about $5,000 when files are shared for personal, non-commercial use...

Which sounds like alot, but if we factor in the extended family and cross-media sharing and the number of separate streaming services we all subscribe to across many many years, then this is a "deal"...

OTOH - I don't want to be the first case/person to help determine what precedent will be set if something actually gets taken to the end-state statutory damages..

link
sfilmeyer 321 days ago
On the spectrum of illegality, things can get a lot more extreme than a bit of copyright infringement.
link
jjkaczor 320 days ago
True - I mean, one could try and block based on file-extension/MIME-types, but... nothing stopping a malicious user from renaming a file to an allowed extension, with some sort of malicious/secret payload. (Or... spreading some sort of malware/virus/exploit via media file formats, I have never looked into the possibility of that until just now, apparently it can be a thing - https://cyberpress.org/cybercriminals-exploiting-media-files...)

So yeah - this is probably one of those half-baked ideas that just wouldn't be a good one to actually implement "in-the-wild".

link