|
|
|
|
|
by iudqnolq
320 days ago
|
|
The problem is that opinions are way cheaper. Look at the article currently promoted at the top of Post opinion page: "Trump is off to a good start with an AI action plan" https://archive.is/ERCme Regardless of what you think of the quality of that opinion, it took very little effort to make. Compare the sources they used to the work it would take go out on the ground and do novel research: - Their own news article about it (itself based on press releases and an off-the-record comment that obviously would have come from someone in the White House press office assigned to promote the press release) - Their own past opinion pieces - Reuters.com - WhiteHouse.gov - Online govt statistics - CNN.com - NeurIPS' blog - Columbia Business School blog - Matthew Yglesias' blog - Greg Lukanioff's blog I could have found those sources based on vague memories of tweets I've seen by following journalists on Bluesky and a few hours of googling. I suspect they did the same, except they used X instead. |
|