Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by chrismorgan 322 days ago
Responsible:

  <link rel="stylesheet" href="/_digested/assets/css/main-e03066e7ad7653435204aa3170643558.css" media="print" onload="this.media='all'">
  <noscript><link rel="stylesheet" href="/_digested/assets/css/main-e03066e7ad7653435204aa3170643558.css"></noscript>
This is deliberate FOUC. Why, I have no notion whatsoever. It should read:

  <link rel="stylesheet" href="/_digested/assets/css/main-e03066e7ad7653435204aa3170643558.css">
2 comments
porridgeraisin 321 days ago
Yeah. Maybe they separated critical and non-critical CSS? and delayed non-critical CSS, that way you'll see a degraded version of the page on slow connections.

Can't think of any other reason why you would do this.

link
arclight_ 321 days ago
IIRC I followed the advice of PageSpeed or another Google page to do it that way. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Appreciate the feedback!

link