[ACCount36]

People who should be fired are the very people who would be the best at justifying why they shouldn't be fired. Not at all by a coincidence.

"Slicing at random" could actually outperform most other methods, as long as it's truly random. You can weasel your way out of a firing based on vibes or performance reviews - but you can't convince an RNG that its roll was wrong.

[mulmen]

Slicing at random would leave the same ratio of worker types. Random slices have the potential to cause enormous damage by removing critical contributors while also creating exploitable power vacuums. The actual solution is to just continue operating the way NASA has been operating because it's not actually a problem.

[ACCount36]

Not actually a problem? Have you seen what NASA is doing lately?

SLS. Orion. Gateway. Ambitionless Artemis. JPL's disaster of an MSR proposal. NASA reeks of rot and decay. It's not in a good place, and hasn't been in a long time now.

If you "just continue operating", it's only going to get worse.

[mulmen]

SLS is Congress, not NASA. The core mission of NASA is space exploration and their achievements in that domain are unparalleled.

Randomly firing and cutting funding isn’t a solution. Especially not to a perceived problem. If you think the spending is excessive you have to do the hard work of explaining why and then the even harder work of fixing it. If that seems too hard then yeah, it’s fine.