[scorcher]

I don't really get this. Surely JavaScript and C# are so hugely different that any converted code would be horrific? Wouldn't it be simpler to just write JavaScript in JavaScript?

[jeswin]

- Translating a statically-typed Object Oriented language to JS wouldn't produce hugely different (/horrific) code. From inheritance to lambdas, there are comparable features available in JS. Going from JS to C# might be harder though.

- It might be simpler to write JS, but I can imagine people wanting to see if type-safety has benefits.

[erik-kallen]

That's right, it doesn't get horrific until you use goto or yield (which don't exist in Javascript so they have to be emulated).

[TazeTSchnitzel]

Some browsers, and ES Harmony, have yield. You could add a compiler switch to use native support, although only Firefox seems to support this just now.

Curious to see how you managed the emulation - splitting up a function? Web workers? :)

[erik-kallen]

for (;;), continue and switch.