| > I’m very skeptical about Spinlaunch, but even if you can pour enough epoxy over something to allow it to survive 10k Gs for a few minutes, Please do watch the video I linked to — it was a surprise to the people whose cubesat design they lightly modified, that they didn't need to fill all voids with epoxy resin. > I am not sure you can scale it to 100k+ Gs for weeks, for a postage stamp sized payload that has to be almost perfectly flat - that just seems like a completely different problem domain. If anything, I expect "flat postage stamp" to be easier, even with a 100x increase in G-forces. Thin structure in compression -> total forces are still low. Balancing a fully laden lorry on a 10cm cube of steel (7.5kg vs 50 tons ~= 6,000x) seems borderline in the way that balancing a 10cm cube of steel on top of 1cm^2 of 80 gsm paper (=8mg vs 7.5kg ~= 937500) doesn't. (Edit: forgot density of steel, thought it was 5 not 7.5) > I think the idea bears further investigation, but the omission from the paper feels a bit odd. 100%. It does feel a bit like it's formalising my shower thoughts. > Good luck with the novel! Thanks, I'll need it! >_> |
And even if you can find some magic superglue left in the tube to hold it there, it has to hang there for weeks: A cubist sword of Damocles.