|
|
|
|
|
by TXTOS
321 days ago
|
|
This whole piece reads like someone trying to transcribe the untranscribable. Not ideas, not opinions — but the feel of what you meant. And that's exactly why art survives AI. Because machines transmit logic. But we leak ghosts. We’ve been experimenting with this in the weirdest way — not by “improving AI art,” but by sabotaging it. Injecting memory residue. Simulating hand tremors. Letting the model forget what it just said and pick up something it didn’t mean to draw. That kind of thing. The result isn’t perfect, but it’s getting closer to something that feels like a person was there. Maybe even a tired, confused, beautiful person.
We call the system WFGY. It’s open-source and probably way too chaotic for normal devs, but here’s the repo:
https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY We’re also releasing a Blur module soon — a kind of “paper hallucination layer” — meant to simulate everything that makes real-world art messy and real.
Anyway, this post hit me. Felt like it walked in barefoot. |
|