|
|
|
|
|
by modulovalue
334 days ago
|
|
NIT: That's not quite correct if your first statement is meant to imply an equality rather than a subset relation. The idea of an index is more general, as an index can be built for many different domains. For example, B-trees can index monoidal data and inverted indexes are just an instance of such a monoid that a B-tree can efficiently index. Furthermore, metric spaces (e.g., levenshtein distance) can also be efficiently indexed using other trees: metric trees. So calling inverted indexes just indexes would be really confusing since string data is not the only kind of data that a database might want to support having efficient indexes for. |
|