[cibyr]

So many autoplaying videos on the page, and none of them are the video that the article is about.

[DavidSJ]

This is the original video, for those looking: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=77ubC4bcgRM

[praptak]

PSA: it's easy to miss on the first watch because the big action happens in the background behind the gate.

[wizardforhire]

Thanks, first watch all I saw was the driveway crack appear. Second pass could be mistaken for a parallax effect as the entire background shifts forward!

[nobrains]

So, I recommend seeing it in 3 passes. 1st pass, see the right 1/3rd area of the video. It shows the 2 sides moving. Then see the middle 1/3rd area of the video. It shows both the movement and the rupture in the ground. Then see the left 1/3rd area of the video. It shows the rupture on the ground clearly.

[frauhaus]

And here’s the related paper: https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/tsr/article/5/3/281/659...

[dang]

Link added to the top text. Thanks!

[dang]

Link added to the top text. Thanks!

[fuenaksofu]

Interesting. I see no other video. I use brave so maybe it blocked all the ads and noise.

[brabel]

Firefox with AdBlocker Ultimate. Also saw no other videos, thankfully.

[throw123xz]

OT, but the company behind that extension seems to be a bit shady.

uBlock Origin is open source, very efficient, and seems to be well regarded around these parts.

[brabel]

Thanks for letting me know. I always confuse the two and ended up with the "wrong one" I guess.... though they haven't given me any trouble or annoyances so far (they just open a page where I can volunteer to make a payment every now and then, but it's easy enough to close the tab and ignore it).

[Grimblewald]

The article is aweful as well. How could they open with a "screenshot of the movement" with a straight face?

[falseprofit]

It’s the first YouTube embed in the article.

[everdrive]

javascript claims another victim. It's not good to run javascript by default.