|
|
|
|
|
|
by mdaniel
327 days ago
|
|
|
It's your toy, you're welcome to license it however you wish. You are not welcome to call a source-available license as Open Source, because it is not open, it is just available for reading Citing Sentry as inspiration is almost as bad as citing Hashicorp, since they both decided they were open until it inconvenienced them |
|
|
What would be the best approach? MIT/Apache? Or closed source?
Appreciate advice