|
|
|
|
|
by rprasad
5035 days ago
|
|
The point was that it was cited as an example of similar fraudulent claims of athletic prowress, which is directly relevant to the linked article. Whether the article itself is pertinent to HN is beside the point; emmi_guy's comment was pertinent to the discussion of the article. |
|
Look, I was trying to be helpful. If you want to pick a fight, go somewhere else.