Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dcow 330 days ago
Graphic violence generally is considered adult content. Let’s not pretend slapstick comedy is the same as graphic violence. Furthermore, you/kids definitely see cartoons where one character is enamored with another (heart eyes jumping out of sockets) and pursues that character for the entirety of the episode.
3 comments

Let's take Star Wars. Not "graphic," but a lot of killing going on. Some would argue that making the killing less "graphic" actually desensitizes children to the violence.
I am not even talking about really graphic violence, just your run of the mill crime story, shooting your husband to get the life insurance.
Violence is normalised due to gun culture in America. Hollywood plays a part in this too. School shootings which is basically a daily event and a unique bug/feature of American life is a symptom of this.

Sex and procreation which is arguably the complete opposite to murder is ostrasized because of it.

Well that’s not considered adult in any jurisdiction I know of. Maybe PG-13 at most.
I mean that is the point. What happens to the rating if the women does not shoot at her husband but opens her bathrobe and starts undressing him?
Nothing. In the US that’d be PG-13 too.
Really? From a quick search I would have assumed it becomes R rated pretty quickly because of sexually oriented nudity.
"Graphic violence" meant "violence in images" in my lifetime.

Because so many people "learn" words by guessing their meaning from context, it now means what Anthony Burgess called "ultraviolence" in A Clockwork Orange.

Cartoons have already had several re-thinking of what's appropriate as norms have changed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censored_Eleven

> "Graphic violence" meant "violence in images" in my lifetime.

I doubt that

> graphic (adj.) "vivid, describing accurately ," 1660s (graphically "vividly" is from 1570s) [...] Meaning "pertaining to drawing" is from 1756.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/graphic