[gsf_emergency_2]

Sometimes I feel that I should think of 98% of funded research as slop, and get on with life.

But (boring) engineering research, most of math, and (some academic) CS publications seem much less sloppy, I'll give you that

[082349872349872]

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2843975_A_Partial_O... is v interesting, but only goes to 7, so it lacks a 10.5.1?

[gsf_emergency_2]

Ah sorry

chapter 10 of similar title from the book https://extras.springer.com/?query=978-3-642-12820-2

pp491 is the autobio

(I'd thought for a moment it'd be more prudent to offer the proceeds from UK-based web-intrigue than Russian ;)

[082349872349872]

Love the autobio.

Noise and the differential reminds me of Hartmanis & Stearns, Algebraic Structure Theory of Sequential Machines (1966), in that the latter roughly studied how our knowledge of what state an automaton is in diffuses over repeated transitions.

[gsf_emergency_2]

Queued

[bawolff]

For quantum computing the real bullshit comes from private companies like D-wave and IBM.

[gsf_emergency_2]

That's even more likely to be funded research :)

Sorry there should be an "ear-marked" somewhere