[RamblingCTO]

Your comment is tangental at best. You're projecting quite a lot tbh. I'm saying: the stuff it produces is shit and we don't have any connection to the outcome anymore, because our brain goes into "watching TV mode". So the outcome is garbage in any sense.

[murukesh_s]

>the stuff it produces is shit

Not everyone has that opinion. I am not talking about non programmers jumping on the bandwagon but real technologists using it in real world programming [1].

> our brain goes into "watching TV mode"

How many people would have thought the same when calculator came? We can either think like - oh this tool is making kids dumb or you can think like the new tool can make them faster and efficient.

[1] https://antirez.com/news/154

[RamblingCTO]

the very next post from that page is literally this one: https://antirez.com/news/153 (let me quote a comment from the article you referenced: "only HN noobs get a hardon for that")

I am talking from my point of view. I am quite experienced and know what I'm doing in a lot of areas, having 18 years of experience. I am faster without agents, produce better code, know the code and can guarantee maintainability and less bugs. Why on earth would I change that? That it's going to get better in the future is a hypothetical which needs to be proven yet.

It is not a calculator tho. So stop with that nonsensical comparison already. You know exactly what I'm talking about and you're not arguing against my point. That's why I'm saing that your comment ins tangental. LLMs are not a calculator. My point is that LLMs make us neither faster nor more efficient. You trade quality and maintainability (slob) against quality. That's a different trade off and makes the two outcomes uncomparable.