|
|
|
|
|
by necovek
330 days ago
|
|
I understand that: the problem is that in this example, it is, so the problem is obviously somewhere else — that's what we should explore. Is it just that the RFC has not been read properly? Maybe, but even if it was, I do not think having precisely defined behaviour in RFCs is sufficient: real world implementations have to be more flexible due to other buggy implementations they interact with. |
|