[nocoiner]

I am still not clear on what Open Graph is or how the image was used here. Some visual aids would have helped tremendously. I assume it is how a specific thumbnail is included alongside an embedded tweet or article snippet?

From what I can gather, it sounds like his copyright exposure came up when he exported his Twitter archive, including the image in question, and hosted (and, crucially, published) it on his own server. Am I thinking about this the right way?

[dbetteridge]

Open graph essentially provides thumbnails and title data for a news article or publication as links, so the news article returned a header image that displays in the tweet "preview"

In this case the Tweet would have been

> TWEET > linked article with open graph image

When exported the author then returned that same open graph info on their personal site, thus rendering a copyrighted image without a license.

[Retr0id]

Notably, Twitter also re-hosts opengraph thumbnail images via their image CDN (as would just about any other site or app that processes opengraph embeds)

[Kilenaitor]

To elaborate with some context: large sites do this to avoid hammering a small site if posts containing the link go viral.

Like imagine the thumbnail were fetched every time a link appeared in someone's Facebook/Twitter feed. That could be tens of millions of hits easy.

[Retr0id]

It's also a privacy leak - the target page would get to know about every thumbnail view (a la tracking pixel). Although it's likely they only care about keeping that data so they can sell it for themselves, rather than actual privacy.

[theshrike79]

I'd rather the target know it than Twitter or Meta TBH.