|
|
|
|
|
by sarabob
326 days ago
|
|
Ah yes, that makes sense. However, it may work with the article's process - a 100x100 png with lots of 2GB-of-nothing iTXt chunks could be gzipped and served with `Content-Encoding: gzip` - so it would pass the "is a valid png" and "not pixel-huge image" checks but still require decompression in order to view it. |
|
Chrome and Safari both crash after using up all OS memory on the task (Safari crashes earlier and not as badly because it has a per-page memory limit)