|
|
|
|
|
by felineflock
329 days ago
|
|
In the "Climate Change Threat" example, one vector of attack is when the policy changes do not lead to renewable energy adoption or to reduced emissions. That justifies the questioning of whether the climate change was really motivating the policy change or just being used as pretext. |
|
We have solar panels on our house, and recently installed a heat pump with gas furnace backup in place of an AC (for summer) + gas furnace (for winter). We also replaced our gas water heater (near the end of its life) with a heat pump water heater, and I drive an EV (not Tesla :)). All these were partly paid for by various tax rebates. The result is that our electric bill is zero, and our gas bill has plummeted (I think it will be nearly zero), and I spend zero at the gas station and the oil change place. One should be able to sell that idea to anyone who wants to reduce their expenses, and expects to live in a house for a few years to a decade to break even, and to drive their car for five years or so.
Of course the current administration is doing its best to eliminate those tax benefits...