The same could be said of any worldview. So tell me—what part of UNESCO’s decision to admit the “State of Palestine” as a Member State strikes you as objectively righteous?
Can you explain? I'm going to ignore your arrogant decision because I am genuinely curious. What is it about Israeli "settlements" that makes it different from stealing land?
It seems objective that many civilians have been killed and a lot of land stolen.
But my point is that things that seem objective to one group of people might be objectively false to another group.
Which isn't to say that there is no real truth. Just that the premises people hold are so different that the worlds are not compatible.