[refurb]

Love your attempt at bringing in Holocaust denial to evoke emotions.

The total funding was $7M over 2 years. The strike involved 250,000 trucker drivers, or $28 per striker.

As the source said in a NY Times article..

““The whole point of this is that covert action provides a 1 per cent impetus for something that the people want anyway,” he said.” - CIA source

https://www.nytimes.com/1974/09/20/archives/cia-is-linked-to...

[aredox]

>The total funding was $7M over 2 years. The strike involved 250,000 trucker drivers, or $28 per striker.

As if the money was for the strikers and not just their leaders...

(But even so, 28 USD in 1974 would be 180 USD today and was still a pretty sum in Argentina at the time, especially for a trucker)

Bad faith arguments doesn't help believing you have an honest argument to begin with.

[refurb]

> As if the money was for the strikers and not just their leaders...

So you're claiming the leaders were able to convince 250,000 union members to strike because... the leaders wanted it? That makes no sense.

As laid out in the article, the truckers were already upset at the government undermining their entire industry. They didn't need $28 USD to convince them to strike.

It wild how people think the CIA with a few million dollars can convince an otherwise stable democratic nation to overthrow it's leader in a coup.

As the article lays out, the CIA were mostly observers who tossed a bit of money to opposition parties. It's questionable if the CIA had any impact at all considering they weren't backing Pinochet himself, and the timing of the coup caught them by surprise. It's pretty clear they weren't very plugged in to what was happening.