[idoubtit]

I think that comparison is unclear and unfair. The core is that instead of:

    jj rebase -r @ -B abc

the recommended Git alternative is:

    git rebase -i abcd1234
    # move the last line to the desired position

This is a process I use heavily, and one of the rare cases where I prefer the Git way: less cognitive load (I don't need to memorise options b/s/r/d/A/B for `jj rebase`) and the interactive editing of the history feels simpler (especially if I move several commits).

I've used jj for a few weeks, but switched back to git. I'm fluent enough with Git so I never struggle any more. jj mostly felt nice, but the added value was not enough to replace years of expertise.

[baq]

I find

   jj rebase -b @ -d master@origin

to be an excellent improvement over anything git provides, including rerere. It's the first patch queue for git implementation that actually worked for me, which in turn makes github PR UI somewhat bearable.

I occasionally use -r, too, but most of the time it's better to

   jj squash --from ... --into @