Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by acdha 325 days ago
Also small-scale fossil fuel, hydropower, wind, geothermal, etc. What solar does differently than those is be directly usable and not have significant negatives which made it undesirable to have near non-industrial users because it doesn’t make noise, air, or water pollution.
2 comments

Batteries are significant amounts of "nearby risk" that is being handwaved away imo

They are fire/explosion hazards, heavy metals, etc.

They’re a fire risk but have you tried fossil fuels and power lines? The newer battery technologies have significantly minimized the heavy metal needs and especially the sodium-ion batteries really reduce the fire and explosion risk.
We aren't talking about installing coal power plants in people's houses the way we're talking about installing solar and batteries in people's houses
People use gas generators, though, and it’s not like you have to go back further than my grandfather’s lifetime to have factories or other industrial buildings with oil/coal plants on-premise or directly powering machinery. Pollution and logistics pushed away but we didn’t start with a pervasive power grid.
I have a gas line directly into my apartment building, as do the vast majority of buildings in my area.
Genuine question, what do you mean by small-scale fossil fuel

What power output in megawatt are we talking about here? I'm struggling to think of a fossil power source efficient at small scale

Well, if you go back far enough there were a ton of factories and other buildings which had their own small plants but the main thing I was thinking of was stuff like that xAI data center in Memphis with the methane-powered turbines where they’re avoiding grid limits and transmission losses at the expense of pollution.